Despite the F-Gas phasedown that is taking place over the next 12 years, there is still a wide range of refrigerants available. Martin Passingham, product manager for DX at Daikin UK looks at the current landscape and the factors that inform the selection of refrigerants
In response to the F-gas Regulation, the HVAC industry has already started adopting lower-GWP refrigerant alternatives for air conditioning, heat pumps and refrigeration. However, there is no single low-GWP refrigerant suitable for every application. As a result, refrigerant producers will continue to manufacture and supply a diverse range of gases including R32, R410A, HFO blends, CO2 and hydrocarbons, such as R290 (Propane) and R600 (Butane).
The optimal refrigerant depends on the application type, required capacity and temperature range. Therefore, selection should be made based upon four key factors: safety, environmental impact, energy efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
A refrigerant must be safe to use through the entire lifecycle of the equipment, including transport, storage, installation, use, servicing, recovery and recycling. A thorough risk assessment should be carried out for any application, as some refrigerants may be acceptably safe for one type of equipment but not for others. And, while non-flammable and low-toxicity refrigerants may have safety benefits, they may not be ideal from an environmental point of view.
Clearly, in light of the F-gas Regulation, a key consideration when choosing a refrigerant is its effect on the environment. The environmental impact of a system is evaluated by its carbon dioxide tonne equivalent (CO2e), calculated by multiplying the system charge in tonnes by the GWP of the refrigerant used. For example a 10kg (0.01t) system charge of R410A (2,088 GWP) has a 20.88t CO2 equivalent.
The environmental impact assessment should also consider the refrigerant’s heat transfer capacity and heat exchange efficiency, as these can dictate the volume needed.
More efficient gases such as R32, for example, require less refrigerant to deliver the same performance as units operating on higher-GWP refrigerant. How the refrigerant is managed through its lifecycle – including production, leak prevention and recovery, reclamation and destruction – is also important.
Energy efficiency Energy efficiency assessments should not only consider a system’s ability to provide effective cooling and heating for a wide range of exterior temperatures but also its Total Equivalent Warming Impact.
TEWI is used to evaluate the best refrigerant to use for particular applications. It measures the impact of the global warming of a refrigerant during its lifetime versus its indirect emissions in terms of CO2 produced whilst a system is running by looking at its efficiency.
While some gasses seem to offer a low GWP they may not be as efficient as others and the trade-off becomes clear by using this calculation.
Cost-effectiveness Customers want to have affordable solutions for their homes and businesses. Cost effectiveness needs to consider the availability of the refrigerant; the cost of installing and maintaining equipment; the size of the equipment; and whether the refrigerant choice contributes to reducing overall system operation and maintenance costs.
Finally, with refrigerant costs rising, it is worth considering how easy it is to recover and recycle the refrigerant once the equipment reaches the end of its life.